Air / Script · structural study 01

Pressure → membrane demand

Explore an ideal inflated cylinder or sphere. Change pressure, radius, and thickness to compare membrane force and wall stress. Inputs describe an already-inflated shape, independently of the pattern studio mesh.

Preliminary analytical model. This calculates thin-membrane equilibrium for an ideal shape. It does not solve deformation, bending, wrinkling, local seam stresses, supports, or the structural behavior of your uploaded mesh.

Study inputs

The starting values are illustrative, not measurements of Pam’s samples. For fabrics, force per unit width is often the more useful quantity.

Compare with your strip tests

Optional: enter breaking force divided by specimen width, using the weakest relevant fabric direction and the actual seam construction. The tool conservatively compares the larger membrane force with the lower entered strip strength, divided by your comparison factor.

3 is an example factor, not a design recommendation. A uniaxial strip comparison cannot certify a biaxially loaded fabric assembly.

Hoop force per unit width—
Hoop membrane stress—

Idealized membrane view

0 →

One uniform color represents the larger analytical membrane stress. Mesh lines illustrate geometry only; they are not finite elements. The scale stays fixed when inputs change. Values above the scale maximum saturate the color.

DirectionMembrane force · N/mmWall stress · MPa
Enter measured strip strengths to show a comparison level.

Pressure sweep

At the entered radius and thickness. The dot marks the current pressure; the line follows the larger membrane force. Changing pressure here does not expand or reshape the geometry.

How I would connect this to my sewn prototypes

Start with a tube or rounded chamber, measure its inflated radius and gauge pressure, and compare the analytical force with fabric and seam strip tests. Then record pressure, dimensions, seam behavior, and leakage during a small physical test. An arch, a junction, or an irregular inflated mesh needs a model that includes its actual geometry and restraints.

Equations, units, and model boundaries

Gauge pressure p = inside pressure − outside pressure. With p in N/mm², radius r in mm, and thickness t in mm: cylinder hoop force N₁ = pr, axial force N₂ = pr/2; sphere N₁ = N₂ = pr/2. Wall stress σ = N/t, in N/mm² = MPa. Pressure entered in kPa is divided by 1,000 to obtain N/mm².

The model assumes a thin, taut membrane in its prescribed inflated configuration, uniform thickness and pressure, and no external loading. The closed cylinder is evaluated away from end effects. Radius/thickness below 10 is flagged as outside the tool’s thin-wall screen. At zero pressure, the result is zero membrane demand; it does not imply that an unpressurized textile will hold its shape. Woven-fabric anisotropy, silicone stretch and thinning, pattern compensation, seam peel, stress concentrations, and stability require additional analysis.

What a full inflatable-structure analysis would need

A reference cutting geometry and fabric directions; measured warp/weft and shear response or a calibrated silicone hyperelastic model; seams, reinforcement, and ports; supports and anchors; gauge pressure and external loads; nonlinear pressurization and large-deformation equilibrium; and comparison with physical pressure–shape tests. Outputs should include displacement, membrane force/stress with units, support reactions, and convergence information.